Frameworks / The Five Dysfunctions

A team is only as strong as the level it skipped.

Results sit on top of accountability, commitment, conflict and trust. Pull out the bottom and everything above it comes down.

From the book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by Patrick Lencioni (2002)

Book a free 30-minute call →Oregon · SW Washington · Seattle
Model · Five levelsTeam: Healthy
Trust Absence of trust Healthy conflict Fear of conflict Commitment Lack of commitment Accountability Avoidance ofaccountability Results Inattentionto results

›Show the team

Trust, healthy conflict, commitment, accountability, results. Each level needs the one below it.

The idea

In brief.

Patrick Lencioni's The Five Dysfunctions of a Team tells the story of a leadership team that's smart, experienced and failing. The problem isn't strategy. It's how they work together.

His model is a pyramid. At the bottom is an absence of trust: people won't admit mistakes or weaknesses. Without trust, the team avoids conflict and keeps the peace instead of debating ideas. Without debate, nobody truly commits. Without commitment, nobody holds anyone accountable. And without accountability, people chase status and their own department's goals instead of the team's results.

Turn it around and you get the healthy version: trust, healthy conflict, commitment, accountability and results. Each level depends on the one beneath it, which is why you build from the bottom.

The pyramid

Five levels, built from the bottom.

Instead of invulnerability

Trust

Leaders can say "I was wrong" or "I need help" without worrying it will be used against them. Everything else is built on this.

Instead of artificial harmony

Healthy conflict

The team argues openly about ideas, not people. Without it, meetings stay polite and the real debate happens in the hallway.

Instead of ambiguity

Commitment

People commit to decisions they had a real say in, even when they disagreed. No debate means no buy-in, just quiet foot-dragging.

Instead of low standards

Accountability

Teammates call each other on behavior that hurts the team, without waiting for the boss to do it.

Instead of status and ego

Results

The team's shared results come before anyone's title, budget or department. It's the point of everything below it.

With clients

How I use it.

Part of my work inEOS® Implementation →
  1. Assess the teamEach leader answers a short set of questions about how the team works together. The answers show where the pyramid is weakest.
  2. Build trust firstLeaders share their stories, strengths and weaknesses. It feels soft. It's the most practical thing we do.
  3. Practice conflict and commitmentIn working sessions the team debates real issues, decides, and leaves knowing exactly what was agreed and who owns it.
  4. Hold the lineA weekly scorecard and 90-day priorities make accountability peer to peer, so results stop depending on one person chasing everyone.

Try this

Questions to ask your team.

  • When did someone on the leadership team last admit a mistake in a meeting?
  • Do our meetings have real debate, or polite agreement?
  • After a decision, does everyone leave saying the same thing?
  • Who holds peers accountable: the team, or only the boss?
  • Does each leader care more about team results or their own department?

Related insights

More on this.

More frameworks

Next step

Build the team from the bottom up.

A free 30-minute call about how your leadership team works together and where the pyramid is weakest.

Book a free 30-minute call →